بررسی رابطه ی بین تیپ های شبانه روزی و بار کاری فکری در کارگران مونتاژ یک صنعت تولیدی

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 کارشناسی ارشد مهندسی بهداشت حرفه ای، گروه مهندسی بهداشت حرفه ای، دانشکده بهداشت، دانشگاه علوم پزشکی اصفهان

2 دانشجوی کارشناسی ارشد، گروه مهندسی بهداشت حرفه ای، کمیته تحقیقات دانشجویی، دانشکده بهداشت، دانشگاه علوم پزشکی اصفهان، اصفهان، ایران.

چکیده

زمینه و هدف: برخی افراد فعالیت روزانه و برخی دیگر، فعالیت شبانه را ترجیح می‌دهند. طبق مطالعات سطح عملکرد، ممکن است تحت تاثیر ریتم‌های شبانه روزی قرار گیرد. بارکاری فکری بالا زمانی اتفاق می افتد که وظیفه خواسته شده بیش از ظرفیت فرد باشد. با توجه به احتمال وجود ارتباط بین تیپ‌های شبانه روزی با بار کاری فکری، در مطالعه پیش‌رو رابطه بین تیپ‌های شبانه روزی با بار کاری فکری در کارگران مونتاژ یک صنعت تولیدی بررسی شد.
مواد و روش ها: این پژوهش یک مطالعه مقطعی است که به روش نمونه گیری تصادفی ساده روی 120 نفر خانم مونتاژکار شاغل در یک صنعت تولیدی انجام شد. برای بررسی تیپهای شبانه روزی و بارکاری فکری به‌ترتیب از نمونه نسخه ایرانی پرسشنامه صبحگاهی-شامگاهی هورن-استبرگ (Moring- Evening Questionnaire (MEQ)) و NASA-TLX (Task Load Index) استفاده گردید. تحلیل داده ها با استفاده از نرم افزار20 SPSS، ضریب همبستگی پیرسون، اسپیرمن و آزمون کای دو انجام و 05/0 P value

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله [English]

The relationship between circadian types and mental workload in assembly workers of a manufacturing company

نویسندگان [English]

  • Zahra Ordudari 1
  • Farzane Fadaei 2
1 MSc student of Occupational Health Engineering, Department of Occupational Health Engineering, Student Research Committee, Faculty of Health, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
2 MSc student, Student Research Committee, School of Health, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.
چکیده [English]

Introduction and Aims: Some of people prefer daily activities; others, nightly ones. Studies have shown that performance levels may be affected by circadian rhythms. The high mental workload occurs when the task is greater than the capacity of the operator. Regarding the probable relationship between circadian types and mental workload, we decided to evaluate this factor in the assembly workers of a manufacturing company.
Materials and Methods: The study was a descriptive -analytic and cross-sectional one being carried out among 120 female assembly workers of manufacturing company. In order to evaluate of circadian types and mental work load, Iranian version of MEQ (Moring- Evening Questionnaire) and NASA-TLX (NASA-Task Load Index) have respectively been used. Data analysis was carried out by using SPSS 20. It is noteworthy to mention that P value

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Assembly workers
  • MEQ
  • circadian type
  • Workload
  • NASA-TLX
1. Goldstein D, Hahn CS, Hasher L, Wiprzycka UJ, Zelazo PD. Time of day, intellectual performance, and behavioral problems in Morning versus Evening type adolescents: Is there a synchrony effect? Pers Individ Dif. 2007;42(3):431-40.
2. Randler C. Association between morningness–eveningness and mental and physical health in adolescents. Psychol Health Med. 2011;16(1):29-38.
3. Gelbmann G, Kuhn-Natriashvili S, Pazhedath TJ, Ardeljan M, Wöber C, Wöber-Bingöl Ç. Morningness: protective factor for sleep-related and emotional problems in childhood and adolescence? Chronobiol Int. 2012;29(7):898-910.
4. Roenneberg T, Kuehnle T, Pramstaller PP, Ricken J, Havel M, Guth A, et al. A marker for the end of adolescence. Curr Biol. 2004;14(24):R1038-R9.
5. Natale V, Di Milia L. Season of birth and morningness: comparison between the northern and southern hemispheres. Chronobiol Int. 2011;28(8):727-30.
6. Rodrigues PF, Pandeirada JN, Marinho PI, Bem-Haja P, Silva CF, Ribeiro L, et al. Morningness–eveningness preferences in Portuguese adolescents: Adaptation and psychometric validity of the H&O questionnaire. Pers Individ Dif. 2016;88:62-5.
7. Caci H, Robert P, Boyer P. Novelty seekers and impulsive subjects are low in morningness. Eur Psychiatry. 2004;19(2):79-84.
8. Mecacci L, Righi S, Rocchetti G. Cognitive failures and circadian typology. Pers Individ Dif. 2004;37(1):107-13.
9. Cavallera G, Giudici S. Morningness and eveningness personality: A survey in literature from 1995 up till 2006. Personality and Individual differences. 2008;44(1):3-21.
10. Tonetti L, Fabbri M, Natale V. Relationship between circadian typology and big five personality domains. Chronobiology international. 2009;26(2):337-47.
11. Stubler WF, O'Hara JM, Higgins JC, Kramer J. Human systems interface and plant modernization process: Technical basis and human factors review guidance. BROOKHAVEN NATIONAL LAB UPTON NY, 2000.
12. Endsley MR. Situation awareness misconceptions and misunderstandings. Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making. 2015;9(1):4-32.
13. Parasuraman R, Sheridan TB, Wickens CD. Situation awareness, mental workload, and trust in automation: Viable, empirically supported cognitive engineering constructs. Journal of Cognitive Engineering and Decision Making. 2008;2(2):140-60.
14. DiDomenico A, Nussbaum MA. Interactive effects of physical and mental workload on subjective workload assessment. International journal of industrial ergonomics. 2008;38(11-12):977-83.
15. Loft S, Sanderson P, Neal A, Mooij M. Modeling and predicting mental workload in en route air traffic control: Critical review and broader implications. Human Factors. 2007;49(3):376-99.
16. Rubio S, Díaz E, Martín J, Puente JM. Evaluation of subjective mental workload: A comparison of SWAT, NASA‐TLX, and workload profile methods. Applied Psychology. 2004;53(1):61-86.
17. DiDomenico AT. An investigation on subjective assessments of workload and postural stability under conditions of joint mental and physical demands: Virginia Tech; 2003.
18. Cinaz B, Arnrich B, La Marca R, Tröster G. Monitoring of mental workload levels during an everyday life office-work scenario. Personal and ubiquitous computing. 2013;17(2):229-39.
19. Song J, Stough C. The relationship between morningness–eveningness, time-of-day, speed of information processing, and intelligence. Pers Individ Dif. 2000;29(6):1179-90.
20. Rahafar A, SADEGHI JM, Sadeghpour A, MIRZAIE S. Surveying Psychometric Features of Persian Version of Morning-Eventide Questionnaire. 2013.
21. Noyes JM, Bruneau DP. A self-analysis of the NASA-TLX workload measure. Ergonomics. 2007;50(4):514-9.
22. Wiebe EN, Roberts E, Behrend TS. An examination of two mental workload measurement approaches to understanding multimedia learning. Computers in Human Behavior. 2010;26(3):474-81.
23. Khandan M, Maghsoudipour M. Survey of workload and job satisfaction relationship in a productive company. Iran Occupational Health. 2012;9(1):30-6.
24. Mazloumi A, Ghorbani M, Nasl Saraji G, Kazemi Z, Hosseini M. Workload Assessment of Workers in the Assembly Lines of a Car Manufacturing Company. Iran Occupational Health. 2014;11(4):44-55.
25. Hughes LE. The influence of multiple risk factors on WMSD risk and evaluation of measurement methods used to assess risks: Virginia Tech; 2007.
26. Boerner K, Scherf C, Leitner-Mai B, Spanner-Ulmer B. Field study of age-differentiated strain for assembly line workers in the automotive industry. Work. 2012;41(Supplement 1):5160-6.
27. Malekpour F, Fazli Ochhesar B, Mohammadpour Y, Mohammadian Y, Hasanluei B. Assessmen of relationship between quality of life and mental workload among nurses of Urmia Medical Science University hospitals. The Journal of Urmia Nursing and Midwifery Faculty. 2014;12(6):499-505.
28. Yousef Zade A, Mazloumi A, Abbasi M, Akbar Zade A. Investigating the relationship between cognitive failures and workload among nurses of Imam Khomeini and Vali-e-Asr hospitals in Tehran. Health and Safety at Work. 2016;6(2):57-68.
29. Habibi E. Relationship between work ability and mental workload with musculoskeletal disorders in industrial jobs. Journal of Preventive Medicine. 2016;2(4):29-38.
30. Mohammadi H, Seyedshohadai M, Seyedfatemi N, Mehran A. Relationship between Circadian Types and Nurses’ Caring Behaviors. Iran Journal of Nursing. 2014;27(90):44-53.
31. Mikaeili N, Mehri S, GHASEMI NM, Molavi P. The Relationship of Morningness-Eveningness with Sleep Quality and Professional Motivation in Nurses. Journal of Health and Care. 2017;18(4):316-25.
32. Isazadegan A, Sheykhi S, Ahmadian L. Relationship between circadian types (morningnesseveningness) and stress in students. Orumie Journal of Medical. 2011;22(2):137-45.
33. Ezzatian P. Circadian Variation In Auditory Perception And Aging. Master of Art: Thesis, University of Toronto. Toronto; 2006.
34. Savarese JT. Validating the Composite Scale of Morningness using heart rate variability and motor activity as measures of circadian rhythm: ProQuest; 2008.
دوره 26، شماره 3
مرداد و شهریور 1398
صفحه 329-335
  • تاریخ دریافت: 19 تیر 1397
  • تاریخ بازنگری: 22 آبان 1397
  • تاریخ پذیرش: 30 شهریور 1398
  • تاریخ اولین انتشار: 30 شهریور 1398